Problems with carbon dating answers in genesis carbon 14 dating not accurate
"As a Christian, do you clearly understand why young-earth creationists believe that a billions-of-years-old earth is incompatible with the Bible? Yet, there are major theological problems with positions that reject the literal six-day creation week of Genesis 1-2." First, most Christians who hold to an old-earth view DON'T reject the literal six-day creation week of Genesis 1-2.
That is a false allegation by Answers In Genesis (AIG).
Thus, their article is not fair, nor is it scholarly.
In fact, the authors of the article (in my opinion) have deliberately limited their rebuttal of an old earth view to these three false doctrines in a malicious attempt to discredit ALL Christians who hold to an old-earth view.
It is this type of intellectual falsehood that makes it easy to expose these false prophets who teach doctrines of devils, desperately grasping for straws and employing thug-intellectualism to prove their heresies.
It is clear that AIG are not being honest in their views.
I don't believe any of the garbage they've alleged.
The Bible teaches that God destroyed the world in His anger (Jeremiah -28).
Even without having the advantage of the Hebrew language available, anyone can see that the word created is not mentioned again after Genesis 1:1 until the 5th day of creation in Genesis when He created the whales and beasts.Paul Taylor (former manager of AIG) now heads up CSE with Eric Hovind.Paul Taylor and Eric Hovind of Creation Science Evangelism (CSE) are joining up with Ken Ham during their PROOF OF GOD conference to be held in October 12-13 of 2012.Ezekiel -19 teaches that Lucifer was stripped of his heavenly position, authority and glory when he rebelled against God in seeking equality. It is commonly believed (and I disagree) that Satan in his anger and rage destroyed the earth.In fact (and you're about to be amazed), God destroyed the earth in His own anger.
The old-earth view held by most Christians is NOT evolution.